↓ Skip to main content

Quality, equity, and dignity for women and babies

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, October 2016
Altmetric Badge
29

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
20 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quality, equity, and dignity for women and babies
Published in
The Lancet, October 2016
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31525-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary V Kinney, Amy Boldosser-Boesch, Betsy McCallon

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Unknown 118 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 24%
Researcher 24 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 14%
Lecturer 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 29 24%
Unknown 8 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 21%
Social Sciences 13 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Decision Sciences 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 16 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2018.
All research outputs
#659,112
of 14,550,524 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#6,283
of 33,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,552
of 265,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#190
of 516 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,550,524 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,371 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 516 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.