You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Quality, equity, and dignity for women and babies
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Lancet, September 2016
|
DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31525-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mary V Kinney, Amy Boldosser-Boesch, Betsy McCallon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 17% |
Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
Canada | 1 | 6% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
Spain | 1 | 6% |
Kuwait | 1 | 6% |
South Africa | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 9 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 83% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Kenya | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 153 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 41 | 26% |
Researcher | 24 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 6% |
Other | 36 | 23% |
Unknown | 16 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 39% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 39 | 25% |
Social Sciences | 16 | 10% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 2% |
Arts and Humanities | 3 | 2% |
Other | 12 | 8% |
Unknown | 23 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#1,463,482
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#10,224
of 43,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,485
of 319,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#167
of 378 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 378 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.