↓ Skip to main content

Global risk of Zika virus depends critically on vector status of Aedes albopictus

Overview of attention for article published in Lancet Infectious Diseases, March 2016
Altmetric Badge
139

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
49 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Global risk of Zika virus depends critically on vector status of Aedes albopictus
Published in
Lancet Infectious Diseases, March 2016
DOI 10.1016/s1473-3099(16)00176-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lauren M Gardner, Nan Chen, Sahotra Sarkar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Bolivia, Plurinational State of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Madagascar 1 <1%
Unknown 152 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 44 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 11%
Student > Master 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 35 22%
Unknown 21 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 6%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Other 32 20%
Unknown 31 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 139. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2020.
All research outputs
#297,200
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#578
of 6,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,357
of 315,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#12
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,038 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 92.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.