↓ Skip to main content

Global risk of Zika virus depends critically on vector status of Aedes albopictus

Overview of attention for article published in Lancet Infectious Diseases, May 2016
Altmetric Badge
143

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
57 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Global risk of Zika virus depends critically on vector status of Aedes albopictus
Published in
Lancet Infectious Diseases, May 2016
DOI 10.1016/s1473-3099(16)00176-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lauren M Gardner, Nan Chen, Sahotra Sarkar

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 3%
Madagascar 1 <1%
Bolivia, Plurinational State of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 117 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Student > Master 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 10 8%
Other 37 29%
Unknown 2 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 17%
Unspecified 13 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 8%
Other 30 24%
Unknown 2 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 143. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2018.
All research outputs
#90,992
of 12,695,135 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#136
of 3,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,216
of 304,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#10
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,695,135 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.