↓ Skip to main content

Clarification regarding ethical review of Paolo Macchiarini's research

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, April 2016
Altmetric Badge
27

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Clarification regarding ethical review of Paolo Macchiarini's research
Published in
The Lancet, April 2016
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30320-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Hörnlund

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2017.
All research outputs
#498,147
of 12,268,888 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#5,246
of 30,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,412
of 274,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#164
of 451 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,268,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 451 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.