↓ Skip to main content

Associations of urinary sodium excretion with cardiovascular events in individuals with and without hypertension: a pooled analysis of data from four studies

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, May 2016
Altmetric Badge
1037

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
566 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Associations of urinary sodium excretion with cardiovascular events in individuals with and without hypertension: a pooled analysis of data from four studies
Published in
The Lancet, May 2016
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30467-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew Mente, Martin O'Donnell, Sumathy Rangarajan, Gilles Dagenais, Scott Lear, Matthew McQueen, Rafael Diaz, Alvaro Avezum, Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo, Fernando Lanas, Wei Li, Yin Lu, Sun Yi, Lei Rensheng, Romaina Iqbal, Prem Mony, Rita Yusuf, Khalid Yusoff, Andrzej Szuba, Aytekin Oguz, Annika Rosengren, Ahmad Bahonar, Afzalhussein Yusufali, Aletta Elisabeth Schutte, Jephat Chifamba, Johannes F E Mann, Sonia S Anand, Koon Teo, S Yusuf, EPIDREAM and ONTARGET/TRANSCEND Investigators PURE

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 371 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 566 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 557 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 76 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 10%
Student > Master 56 10%
Student > Bachelor 54 10%
Other 53 9%
Other 150 27%
Unknown 120 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 224 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 5%
Social Sciences 10 2%
Other 68 12%
Unknown 156 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1037. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2024.
All research outputs
#16,435
of 26,539,834 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#456
of 43,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238
of 314,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#7
of 549 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,539,834 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,398 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 69.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 549 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.