↓ Skip to main content

Guided de-escalation of antiplatelet treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (TROPICAL-ACS): a randomised, open-label, multicentre trial

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, August 2017
Altmetric Badge
35

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
13 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
463 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
302 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Guided de-escalation of antiplatelet treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (TROPICAL-ACS): a randomised, open-label, multicentre trial
Published in
The Lancet, August 2017
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32155-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dirk Sibbing, Dániel Aradi, Claudius Jacobshagen, Lisa Gross, Dietmar Trenk, Tobias Geisler, Martin Orban, Martin Hadamitzky, Béla Merkely, Róbert Gábor Kiss, András Komócsi, Csaba A Dézsi, Lesca Holdt, Stephan B Felix, Radoslaw Parma, Mariusz Klopotowski, Robert H G Schwinger, Johannes Rieber, Kurt Huber, Franz-Josef Neumann, Lukasz Koltowski, Julinda Mehilli, Zenon Huczek, Steffen Massberg, TROPICAL-ACS Investigators, Radoslaw Parma, Zofia Parma, Maciej Lesiak, Anna Komosa, Zenon Huczek, Lukasz Koltowski, Michal Kowara, Bartosz Rymuza, Mariusz Klopotowski, Lukasz Malek, Daniel Aradi, Gábor Veress, András Döme Dézsi, Béla Merkely, Árpád Lux, Róbert Gábor Kiss, Judit Papp, Andrea Kovács, Csaba András Dézsi, Sayour Amer, Zoltán Ruzsa, Szilárd Róna, András Komócsi, Renáta Ili, Imre Ungi, Ferenc Nagy, Robert Zweiker, Gábor Tóth-Gayor, Kurt Huber, Paul Haller, Wolfgang von Scheidt, Andreas Blüthgen, Franz-Josef Neumann, Dietmar Trenk, Stefan Leggewie, Hans Ulrich Kreider-Stempfle, Thomas Remp, Kaffer Kara, Andreas Mügge, Alexander Wutzler, Stephan Fichtlscherer, Andreas M. Zeiher, Florian Seeger, Martin Hinterseer, Andreas König, Susanne Lederle, Claudius Jacobshagen, Frauke Czepluch, Lars Maier, Wolfgang Schillinger, Samuel Sossalla, Astrid Hummel, Stephan Felix, Mahir Karakas, Karsten Sydow, Tanja Rudolph, Marcel Halbach, Tommaso Gori, Thomas Münzel, Andreas May, Carsten-Manuel Gerstenberg, David Pilecky, Johannes Rieber, Markus Deichstetter, Dirk Sibbing, Julinda Mehilli, Lisa Gross, Stefan Kääb, Anja Löw, Martin Orban, Matthias Orban, Stefan Sattler, Sabine Deuschl, Daniel Teupser, Lesca Holdt, Harald Mudra, Thomas Räder, Torsten Schütz, Felix Vahldiek, Dimitar Divchev, Hüseyin Ince, Christoph A Nienaber, Henning Radunski, Peter Boekstegers, Jan Horstkotte, Ralf Mueller, Tobias Geisler, Karin Müller, Robert Schwinger, Oliver Rasp

Abstract

Current guidelines recommend potent platelet inhibition with prasugrel or ticagrelor for 12 months after an acute coronary syndrome managed with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the greatest anti-ischaemic benefit of potent antiplatelet drugs over the less potent clopidogrel occurs early, while most excess bleeding events arise during chronic treatment. Hence, a stage-adapted treatment with potent platelet inhibition in the acute phase and de-escalation to clopidogrel in the maintenance phase could be an alternative approach. We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of early de-escalation of antiplatelet treatment from prasugrel to clopidogrel guided by platelet function testing (PFT). In this investigator-initiated, randomised, open-label, assessor-blinded, multicentre trial (TROPICAL-ACS) done at 33 sites in Europe, patients were enrolled if they had biomarker-positive acute coronary syndrome with successful PCI and a planned duration of dual antiplatelet treatment of 12 months. Enrolled patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using an internet-based randomisation procedure with a computer-generated block randomisation with stratification across study sites to either standard treatment with prasugrel for 12 months (control group) or a step-down regimen (1 week prasugrel followed by 1 week clopidogrel and PFT-guided maintenance therapy with clopidogrel or prasugrel from day 14 after hospital discharge; guided de-escalation group). The assessors were masked to the treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was net clinical benefit (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke or bleeding grade 2 or higher according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC]) criteria) 1 year after randomisation (non-inferiority hypothesis; margin of 30%). Analysis was intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01959451, and EudraCT, 2013-001636-22. Between Dec 2, 2013, and May 20, 2016, 2610 patients were assigned to study groups; 1304 to the guided de-escalation group and 1306 to the control group. The primary endpoint occurred in 95 patients (7%) in the guided de-escalation group and in 118 patients (9%) in the control group (pnon-inferiority=0·0004; hazard ratio [HR] 0·81 [95% CI 0·62-1·06], psuperiority=0·12). Despite early de-escalation, there was no increase in the combined risk of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke in the de-escalation group (32 patients [3%]) versus in the control group (42 patients [3%]; pnon-inferiority=0·0115). There were 64 BARC 2 or higher bleeding events (5%) in the de-escalation group versus 79 events (6%) in the control group (HR 0·82 [95% CI 0·59-1·13]; p=0·23). Guided de-escalation of antiplatelet treatment was non-inferior to standard treatment with prasugrel at 1 year after PCI in terms of net clinical benefit. Our trial shows that early de-escalation of antiplatelet treatment can be considered as an alternative approach in patients with acute coronary syndrome managed with PCI. Klinikum der Universität München, Roche Diagnostics, Eli Lilly, and Daiichi Sankyo.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 302 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 12%
Other 29 10%
Student > Master 28 9%
Student > Bachelor 24 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 8%
Other 55 18%
Unknown 106 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 123 41%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Unspecified 4 1%
Other 20 7%
Unknown 126 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,177,715
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#8,744
of 43,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,292
of 328,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#145
of 391 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 391 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.