↓ Skip to main content

Riluzole in patients with hereditary cerebellar ataxia: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Lancet Neurology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge
39

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
29 X users
patent
4 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
174 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Riluzole in patients with hereditary cerebellar ataxia: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Published in
Lancet Neurology, August 2015
DOI 10.1016/s1474-4422(15)00201-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silvia Romano, Giulia Coarelli, Christian Marcotulli, Luca Leonardi, Francesca Piccolo, Maria Spadaro, Marina Frontali, Michela Ferraldeschi, Maria Chiara Vulpiani, Federica Ponzelli, Marco Salvetti, Francesco Orzi, Antonio Petrucci, Nicola Vanacore, Carlo Casali, Giovanni Ristori

Abstract

Our previous study in patients with cerebellar ataxias of different causes showed significant benefit of riluzole after 8 weeks. We aimed to confirm these results in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia or Friedreich's ataxia in a 1-year trial. Patients with spinocerebellar ataxia or Friedreich's ataxia (2:1 ratio) from three Italian neurogenetic units were enrolled in this multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, and randomly assigned to riluzole (50 mg orally, twice daily) or placebo for 12 months. The randomisation list was computer-generated and a centralised randomisation system was implemented. Participants and assessing neurologists were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with improved Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) score (a drop of at least one point) at 12 months. An intention-to-treat analysis was done. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01104649. Between May 22, 2010, and Feb 25, 2013, 60 patients were enrolled. Two patients in the riluzole group and three in the placebo group withdrew their consent before receiving treatment, so the intention-to-treat analysis was done on 55 patients (19 with spinocerebellar ataxia and nine with Friedreich's ataxia in the riluzole group, and 19 with spinocerebellar ataxia and eight with Friedreich's ataxia in the placebo group). The proportion with decreased SARA score was 14 (50%) of 28 patients in the riluzole group versus three (11%) of 27 in the placebo group (OR 8·00, 95% CI 1·95-32·83; p=0·002). No severe adverse events were recorded. In the riluzole group, two patients had an increase in liver enzymes (less than two times above normal limits). In two participants in the riluzole group and two participants in the placebo group, sporadic mild adverse events were reported. Our findings lend support to the idea that riluzole could be a treatment for cerebellar ataxia. Longer studies and disease-specific trials are needed to confirm whether these findings can be applied in clinical practice. Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
China 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 145 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 12%
Researcher 17 11%
Other 14 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 34 23%
Unknown 37 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 19%
Neuroscience 28 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 8%
Psychology 6 4%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 45 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,045,425
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Neurology
#675
of 4,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,952
of 279,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Neurology
#14
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,011 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.