The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Brazil's health system woes worsen in economic crisis
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Lancet, April 2016
|
DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30249-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jonathan Watts |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 9% |
Brazil | 2 | 6% |
South Africa | 1 | 3% |
India | 1 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 21 | 66% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 18 | 56% |
Scientists | 6 | 19% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 16% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 3 | 4% |
Unknown | 71 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 20 | 27% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Other | 20 | 27% |
Unknown | 6 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 39% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 5% |
Other | 16 | 22% |
Unknown | 9 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2016.
All research outputs
#1,935,603
of 26,377,159 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#12,138
of 43,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,437
of 317,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#229
of 490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,377,159 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.